Integration of A Multisensory Formative Assessment Framework (MFAF) in Inclusive Classroom Practices (Integrasi Kerangka Penilaian Formatif Multisensori (MFAF) dalam Amalan Bilik Darjah Inklusif)
Keywords:
Formative assesment, inclusive classroom, multisensory learning, MalaysiaAbstract
Formative assessment is central to inclusive education as it allows teachers to continuously monitor, interpret, and support learners’ diverse progress while promoting equitable participation. However, assessment practices in many classrooms still depend heavily on verbal or written responses, which can marginalise pupils with special educational needs (SEN) who demonstrate understanding through nonverbal, sensory, or alternative means. This paper introduces the Multisensory Formative Assessment Framework (MFAF), a conceptual model designed to strengthen inclusive classroom practices by integrating sensory engagement, formative feedback, assistive technology, authentic learning tasks, and reflective teacher practice into a coherent system. Grounded in constructivist, sociocultural, and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles, the MFAF positions assessment as a dynamic and responsive process that values how pupils learn as much as what they learn. It seeks to transform assessment into a multisensory, participatory, and empowering experience that enhances learner engagement and teacher reflection. Ultimately, the MFAF represents a meaningful step toward promoting an equitable, inclusive, and transformative assessment for all learners.References
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2020). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development (pp. 187–249). Jessica Kingsley.
Florian, L., & Beaton, M. (2018). Inclusive pedagogy in action: Getting it right for every child. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(8), 870–884.
Florian, L., & Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135.
Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2019). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge.
Heritage, M. (2021). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin.
Herrington, J., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Authentic learning environments. In M. Spector et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401–412). Springer.
Kraemer, D. J., Rosenberg, L. M., & Kozbelt, A. (2023). Multisensory integration in educational settings: Evidence and applications. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 2159–2182.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Schön, D. A. (2016). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417.
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
It is the author’s responsibility to ensure that his or her submitted works do not infringe any other existing copyright. Authors should obtain letters of permission to reproduce or adapt copyright material and enclose copies of these letters with the final version of the accepted manuscript.
The author indemnifies the editors and publisher against any breach of such a warranty.